Convergence and its role in SEO arbitration, fiscal interests communicated through live forums (pull media). Pathways for discussion, trade business and industry, plus its re – representation using open agnostics – laws surrounding open source distribution
Reference to earlier posts:
Further reference, reply to BlogSpot6 – #28.08.10: Marketing pathways: dictating your own objectives on an open market – aka Sports arbitrage, Exchange Traded Funds, execution and leg risk
Future objectives, topics of interest / relevance;
- DOI, patent and copyright
- Consumers marketplace, monopolies & unfair competition
- Taxation, Inflation, domains and trade routes
- Networks, telecommunication routes
- Dedicated links extranets spanning PAN’s & WAN’s
- International, national and Near field radio broadcast(DAB)
- Push subscriber(synchronous) and pull on demand(asynchronous) technologies
- Licensing & press links, advertising, informatics and validity of content
“..transactional thinking and individual autonomy to shift risk from governments and corporations onto individuals and to extend this kind of market logic into the realm of social and affective relationships.”
Reference post, dated #09.08.10: DOI and digital copyright / patent law
Instead suggesting that this, given certain conditions could be the total opposite, saying that the risk should now be with those same governments, corporations and employers whose transactional thinking has been dictated by their environment / employees, who without individual autonomy at influential levels – operated within their known capacity at that time without full foresight and individualism. Adjudicating, in future years the impact of these same theories in the research, design and development of I.t. objectives, both by businesses leaders, groups and employees – examining laws which surround the sharing and dissemination of ideas – and the efforts to re-write standards and guidelines for evolving technologies with increased probability of error in line with developer capabilities.
Fair dealing, in certain circumstances, some works may be used if that use is considered to be ‘fair dealing’. There is no strict definition of what this means but it has been interpreted by the courts on a number of occasions by looking at the economic impact on the copyright owner of the use. Where the economic impact is not significant, the use may count as fair dealing. So, it may be within the scope of ‘fair dealing’ to make single photocopies of short extracts of a copyright work for non-commercial research or private study, criticism or review, or reporting current events.
Considering not only major system contracts rather the individual, still with the broader economic perspective taking into account the lack of employment opportunities, non – expendable time frames. Active employment workshops, office, desk space plus working days and the ambition of those seeking employment to hone their skills and progress with their applicability for employment. Proposing instead, a system of incorporation with individual efforts becoming limited ventures, a sharing of desk space on a pro rata basis –hotdesking, enabling those long term dis enfranchised with a skillset, aptitude and drive to develop and progress back into the employment market with better knowledge of how to become self sufficient in their contractual roles when and if the set circumstances arise as a consequence of this practice venture. Funding could be extended, enabling an understanding of;
- personal finance
- Business accountability
- Aligning current ambitions, with the emulation of active markets
..gaining additional experience which may otherwise not be applicable without a stable base from which to work.
Referencing, #15.07.10: BlogSpot6, marketing and its paradigms, Adopt a “Competitive Innovation” approach to most major IT systems contracts..
Recap, reply to current post #03.08.2010 – Free market and private monopolies with public funds