“..transactional thinking and individual autonomy to shift risk from governments and corporations onto individuals and to extend this kind of market logic into the realm of social and affective relationships.”
Reference post, dated #09.08.10: DOI and digital copyright / patent law
Instead suggesting that this, given certain conditions could be the total opposite, saying that the risk should now be with those same governments, corporations and employers whose transactional thinking has been dictated by their environment / employees, who without individual autonomy at influential levels – operated within their known capacity at that time without full foresight and individualism. Adjudicating, in future years the impact of these same theories in the research, design and development of I.t. objectives, both by businesses leaders, groups and employees – examining laws which surround the sharing and dissemination of ideas – and the efforts to re-write standards and guidelines for evolving technologies with increased probability of error in line with developer capabilities.
Fair dealing, in certain circumstances, some works may be used if that use is considered to be ‘fair dealing’. There is no strict definition of what this means but it has been interpreted by the courts on a number of occasions by looking at the economic impact on the copyright owner of the use. Where the economic impact is not significant, the use may count as fair dealing. So, it may be within the scope of ‘fair dealing’ to make single photocopies of short extracts of a copyright work for non-commercial research or private study, criticism or review, or reporting current events.